Meesha Moulton, Phoenix product liability lawyer
Phoenix Product Liability

Phoenix product liability lawyer.

Arizona claims against manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of defective products. Two Arizona-specific rules change how cases get tried: pure comparative fault applies to product cases, and a 12-year statute of repose affects some long-tail claims.

Tell us what happened →
2yr
Filing deadline
12yr
Statute of repose
Pure
Comparative fault
3
Defect theories
Where These Cases Cluster

The products that walk
in this door.

Phoenix product cases fall in categories shaped by the metro's industries: construction equipment, automotive components, home and pool products, and consumer electronics.

01.

Heat & Pool Equipment

The climate puts heavy demands on pool equipment, HVAC, and outdoor products. Heater failures, pool drain entrapment, and outdoor equipment failures cluster more heavily here than elsewhere.

02.

Construction & Industrial

Scaffolding, lift equipment, power tools, and protective equipment. These overlap with workers' comp but can be pursued separately against the equipment manufacturer.

03.

Automotive Components

Tire blowouts, airbag failures, and seatbelt cases on I-10 and the loop system. Some intersect with active recalls or pending multi-district litigation.

04.

Consumer Electronics

Battery and charger failures, appliance fires, and similar defects, where preserving the unit and serial numbers is the key early step.

Arizona Law

How Arizona handles
product liability.

Arizona adopted strict products liability following Restatement principles, with the comparative fault statute applying to apportion damages.

Liability Standard

Strict liability under Restatement principles

Three defect theories apply: design defect, manufacturing defect, and failure to warn. A seller can be liable even without negligence if the product was defective and caused injury.

Stuart v. Wilson Drug Stores, 27 Ariz. App. 137 (1976)

Comparative Fault

Pure comparative applied to product cases

User fault (modification, misuse, ignoring instructions) reduces damages by the user's percentage but does not bar recovery. The same modification that would tank a Nevada case is only a damage-reducer in Arizona.

A.R.S. § 12-2505

Filing Deadline

Two years from the date of injury

The standard Arizona personal injury deadline applies to product injury claims.

A.R.S. § 12-542

Statute of Repose

Twelve years from first sale

Section 12-551 cuts off most product claims 12 years after first sale to a user or consumer. Unlike the limitation, which runs from injury, the repose runs from sale, so long-tail injuries can be barred even when the limitation has not run.

A.R.S. § 12-551

The Process

How a product case
develops.

Product cases take longer than most personal injury matters, and the 12-year repose has to be screened at intake.

STEP 01

Preservation & repose screening

Preserve the product, identify the date of first sale, and screen against the 12-year repose period before going further.

STEP 02

Expert engagement

Engineering, medical causation, and warnings experts are engaged early. Their preliminary opinions guide the defect theory.

STEP 03

Pre-suit demand or filing

Most product cases require suit to develop manufacturer discovery. Pre-suit demand can work with smaller manufacturers or where the defect is well-documented.

STEP 04

Discovery & resolution

Maricopa County Superior Court applies Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure with front-loaded Rule 26.1 disclosures. Most cases resolve through summary judgment briefing or pretrial mediation.

Arizona forgives the user's mistake but not the calendar. Twelve years from sale can close the door before the injury ever appears.

Meesha Moulton · Founding Attorney

FAQ

The questions
that come up first.

The questions that come up most often before the first call. If yours is not here, the call is what it is for.

I bought the product more than 10 years ago. Can I still sue?+
Possibly. Section 12-551 cuts off claims 12 years after first sale. The repose can be tolled in limited situations (misrepresentation, latent injury), but the default is a hard 12-year cutoff for many claims.
I modified the product. Can I still recover?+
Modifications affect the case but do not automatically bar it. The question is whether the modification, not the defect, caused the injury. Pure comparative fault allows recovery reduced by the user's percentage.
The retailer says the manufacturer is responsible. Are they right?+
Under Arizona strict products liability, the retailer can be liable alongside the manufacturer. Section 12-684 gives the retailer indemnification rights, but that is between them. You can recover against the retailer regardless.
What if the product was recalled?+
A pre-injury recall supports failure to warn. A post-injury recall is generally admissible under Rule 407 exceptions in many circumstances. Recall information is part of the picture but does not automatically prove liability.
How long do these cases take in Phoenix?+
Typically 18 to 30 months, longer at trial. Expert work and corporate discovery are the major drivers of timing.
Get Started

Injured by a
defective product?

Call and tell us what happened, and keep the product if you still have it. Meesha personally reviews every case. No fee, until your case is won.

Call NowFree Consultation